A century after this explorer took their sacred skulls, islanders reclaim them
admin
IT WAS an unexpected message from the other side of the world.
The request to museum officials in Glasgow was simple but heartfelt: Return the skulls of our forefathers.
More than a century after the remains were brought back by Scottish missionary Robert Bruce from Mer Island, off the Australian coast, and following two years of negotiations, the island’s inhabitants yesterday got their wish.
The skulls were handed over in a solemn ceremony to representatives of the remote community of 450 people in the Torres Strait.
They had been lodged in Glasgow’s museum archive for decades and never displayed.
Archie Graham, Glasgow City Council’s executive member for culture, said: “It’s time to right this wrong. I’m pleased that after all this time, these remains will be returned with the dignity and respect that should be afforded them.”
Mr Graham added that he hoped the act of returning the remains would go some way to “healing the very obvious wounds felt by the peoples of the Torres Strait”.
The skulls of five tribesmen were acquired by Mr Bruce in 1898. They had been bought as part of an anthropological study carried out by Professor Alfred Haddon, a Cambridge University academic.
Initially travelling to the area to study marine zoology, Professor Haddon had become fascinated with the rapidly vanishing customs and ceremonies there.
He returned with a team of scientific experts, using some of the earliest film-making and sound-recording technology to document the islanders’ lives. The skulls were later brought to Glasgow.
Pat Allan, the local authority’s world culture curator, said the skulls had been measured and studied as part of research
examining potential links between evolution and culture.
She explained: “In those days, museums were seen as having two purposes: one was to display the bounty of the British Empire, the other was to create an archive for study and research.”
As a token of appreciation, the Mer islanders presented Mr Graham with a colourful feathered dhari traditionally worn as war head-dress.
Ron Day, chairman of the Mer Island community council, said the return of the remains was of great significance to his people: “The true meaning of this act is very hard to explain in a logical sense. Our culture is based on spirituality and to us that is the mechanism that made our community run and exist.
“It has particular significance for me, as some of the remains belong to one of my ancestors.”
Although the location of the skulls has not been a secret, the Mer islanders were helped by the Australian government, which has a team in Britain who examine museum archives looking for items that may have been taken without permission.
The skulls will now be returned to Australia for examination. The islanders have yet to take a final decision on what should be done with them. A HISTORY OF RETURNING RELICS
GLASGOW council has a history of returning relics and remains to the indigenous groups that they were taken from over the past centuries.
The best-known instance was the return of the Ghost Dance shirt to the Lakota Sioux native Americans from South Dakota. The sacred item had been taken from the body of a dead native American during the massacre of Wounded Knee in 1890 and brought to Glasgow in 1892.
Over the past 17 years, the council has also returned human remains to the Mount Morgan community of Northern Queensland and three preserved Maori heads and a human femur were given back to New Zealand.
A council spokesman said that every consideration was given to requests from indigenous populations: “We’re very clear that where there is a good strong moral case for returning an item - where human remains are concerned for instance - we will look very closely at it.”
He said that given Glasgow had almost a million artefacts in its museums it was unlikely that a “handful of requests” from indigenous cultures for items “would empty their archives”.
Posted in Uncategorized |
No Comments »









